The Spatial Miscellany


A weblog. A website. A geospatial miscellany…

The Royal Mail PAF, that old Chestnut…

Tom Watson…MP for West Bromwich East, the UK’s first Parliamentary blogger, and critically, the cabinet office minister responsible for delivering on the Power Of Information report, recently noted interest in the issues surrounding access to the Royal Mail Postcode Address File (PAF); Tom was promptly informed it was an ‘old chestnut’, what on Earth could that mean?

PAF: That old Chestnut

I talked it over with my well informed friend at the council, who cast some light on the interaction between Local Government, the Royal Mail and the Ordnance Survey…

…local government has an inescapable business need to store data about a multitude of non-addressable objects (ATMs, bus shelters, you name it…they probably need it). Ten years ago, no such dataset existed, historically the old OS address products (AddressPoint etc.) only contained entities that received post, as they were all based on the Royal Mail PAF. To address this business need Local Government set about creating a National Land and Property Gazetteer (NLPG) because no dataset existed which met their needs. Now, here is the Chestnut, enter stage left, two government agencies tasked with delivering a Return on Investment\Capital Employed, and a fictional property developer…

Watson PLC decide to build some new properties. Having identified and procured a suitable site and decided what you would like to build the next step, by law, is to apply for Planning Permission from the appropriate local authority. As part of that process you are required to submit detailed, scaled drawings showing precisely what you are proposing to build and where you are proposing to build it. So… local government is always the first to know about new developments.

If you are granted Planning Permission then you are advised to contact the “Street Naming and Numbering Officer” of the Local Authority concerned to agree the addresses of your new properties with them. This is a statutory duty of local government that, legally, no-one else can do (The legislation under which this happens varies but it’s most often Sections 17-19 of the 1925 Public Health Act). If you’re building new streets the Local Authority name them and add them to the National Street Gazetteer. They also allocate the individual property numbers.

Now the daft bit; clearly the only organisation that can assign a postcode to new properties is Royal Mail as postcodes are their property (and exist solely for the purpose of facilitating the delivery of mail by Royal Mail). The Local Authority Street Naming and Numbering Officer therefore has to give their new addresses to Royal Mail for them to add the postcode and, if one is necessary, the post town. As soon as an address contains a postcode it becomes Royal Mail’s Intellectual Property as they own postcodes! They then pass the address to OS who geo-code it, link it to the OSMM TOID, stick it in Address Layer 2 and sell it!

The real choker for Local Government and the UK tax payer is that if Local Government wishes to use address data with postcodes in, which of course they have to, then they have to pay royalties to Royal Mail to do so! They are forced to spend taxpayers money “buying back” address data most of which they created in the first place!

…my friend at the council puts his spin on the process to underline his frustration, just as the man from the OS, or the woman from the Royal Mail might put their spin on the process to underline their frustration. But the real issue here is…this is the system working?! All organisations are doing a good job, working to direction from the government, and delivering their targets. However, this doesn’t disguise the fact that… millions of pounds of tax payers money is being spent in duplicating what should be a single, definite and accessible resource.

4 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. GeoFiction

    This post raises so many issues. The great advantage of the postcode is that it uniquely provides an accurate and unambiguous spatial reference which individuals actually remember (their own), ensuring its universal usage. Should the Royal Mail hold the country to ransom on this? Or are they just in the lucky position of having thought of it first, ensured its popularity and now reaping the commercial rewards?

    I find the situation with street-names and place-names more incredible. Whereas you are correct that Local Authorities have the duty to allocate street names and numbers, this is problematic, because there is little guidance provided on this. Some do the job more thoroughly than others. Some simply adopt a developer’s naff suggestion of “Cherry Close” rather than trying to research a more vernacular name. However, there is NO authority for deciding on district, settlement and geographical feature names.

    The UN instructed members to establish national place name authorities (Resolution IV of the UN Conference of Geographic Names (1967)).

    The USA has the US Board on Geographic Names, the UK has never done this. We are therefore in contravention of a UN resolution.

    Bizarrely we have an Imperial hangover from the 19th Century: the Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British Official Use, who’s “Principal function is to advise British government departments and agencies on policies and procedures for the proper writing, in official publications, of geographical names for places and features OUTSIDE the United Kingdom, excluding those of the Antarctic”.

    You will find mention of the need for a Geographical Names Authority as part of the GI Strategy for Scotland.

  2. Rob

    So that’s a contravention of a UN resolution?

    News today of access of sorts to the PAF over on MP Tom Watson’s blog.

  1. I’m a Mac? - Jan 4th, 2009


Free GIS Software...

Download ArcGIS Explorer, a free geobrowser from ESRI!


Use ArcGIS Explorer to visualise geographic datasets. The latest build provides full access to Virtual Earth imagery and comprehensive support for several data formats including GeoRSS, KML and ArcGIS Layerfiles.

Before you go

Going so soon? Test your geography with the...


Do you support the campaign? Should government-funded and approved agencies such as the Ordnance Survey collect data with significant indirect contributions from the UK tax-payer, but then charge users and companies for access to it?


Download Flash plugin